Comments on: Apple C, Apple P http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/ non-monogamy + love + sex + whatever Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:52:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Sarah http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-1540 Sarah Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:34:00 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-1540 did he give you a name? Just in case... did he give you a name? Just in case…

]]> By: lifebeginsat30ty http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-761 lifebeginsat30ty Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:03:20 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-761 Ugh! I hate this! I just wrote a post/rant this week about this same thing! If you're going to mass post, at least remember who you already sent it too! This guy is just creepy. I don't get these guys that think that being overly solicitous is going to get them anywhere. Just discovered your blog and loving it! Ugh! I hate this! I just wrote a post/rant this week about this same thing! If you’re going to mass post, at least remember who you already sent it too! This guy is just creepy. I don’t get these guys that think that being overly solicitous is going to get them anywhere.

Just discovered your blog and loving it!

]]> By: Jane http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-760 Jane Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:48:38 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-760 'Bot. And a boring one at that. ‘Bot. And a boring one at that.

]]> By: Ben W http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-759 Ben W Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:38:09 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-759 This is the creepiest part - I looked at his answers to a few of the questions on OKC: Would you leave an otherwise perfect relationship if you found out your partner was interested in children sexually? Kafka: No Me: Yes (in red, which means he considers it an unacceptable answer) This is the creepiest part – I looked at his answers to a few of the questions on OKC:

Would you leave an otherwise perfect relationship if you found out your partner was interested in children sexually?

Kafka: No
Me: Yes (in red, which means he considers it an unacceptable answer)

]]> By: Bonnie http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-758 Bonnie Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:28:37 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-758 "As you have not replied, I can only conclude that you are still pondering the issue..." No, you can conclude that I think you're a pompous jerk who probably cut a photo out of Sears catelogue and passed it off on your own. Block the muthafucka. “As you have not replied, I can only conclude that you are still pondering the issue…”

No, you can conclude that I think you’re a pompous jerk who probably cut a photo out of Sears catelogue and passed it off on your own.

Block the muthafucka.

]]> By: Cath http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-757 Cath Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:34:38 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-757 He's sent me the same email as Sam twice and I just got another morning. But it's different! Maybe he's really my soulmate... "I have already sent you a number of messages for invite to chat... but chatting is not really my thing. As I a believer in dialogue and discussion, as a clearly intelligent woman, I am sure that you can appreciate that. So, forgive me, if I find myself enamoured with just an image/avatar and a profile of someone I do not yet know. For I keep trying to make the connection to which I get no response. Maybe this time, will be different." I say, not. :) He’s sent me the same email as Sam twice and I just got another morning. But it’s different! Maybe he’s really my soulmate…

“I have already sent you a number of messages for invite to chat… but chatting is not really my thing. As I a believer in dialogue and discussion, as a clearly intelligent woman, I am sure that you can appreciate that.

So, forgive me, if I find myself enamoured with just an image/avatar and a profile of someone I do not yet know. For I keep trying to make the connection to which I get no response.

Maybe this time, will be different.”

I say, not. :)

]]> By: thatwordchickblog http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-756 thatwordchickblog Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:46:26 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-756 A personals ad/reply should not read like an SEO-friendly intro to a website. I guess he spent so much time getting it just the way he wanted it, he figured "Why waste it on just one woman when I can just omit personal details and reuse the sucker?" Tragic. Perhaps he will meet a britney bot on twitter one day and they'll settle down and make lots of vapid offspring. A personals ad/reply should not read like an SEO-friendly intro to a website. I guess he spent so much time getting it just the way he wanted it, he figured “Why waste it on just one woman when I can just omit personal details and reuse the sucker?”

Tragic. Perhaps he will meet a britney bot on twitter one day and they’ll settle down and make lots of vapid offspring.

]]> By: wallyfrost http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-755 wallyfrost Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:20:54 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-755 There were a few similar posts on Fetlife that, like this, conflate the writers' interest in an NSA or on-the-side fuck with a charitable favour to the fuckee, also use wannabe high-falootin' language. I can't fault someone for wanting to get laid, but the charitable aspect of it seems really fucking condescending. It reads as though these guys watched Roger Dodger, or read The Game, and are acting on some hackneyed understanding of What Women Want . There were a few similar posts on Fetlife that, like this, conflate the writers’ interest in an NSA or on-the-side fuck with a charitable favour to the fuckee, also use wannabe high-falootin’ language.

I can’t fault someone for wanting to get laid, but the charitable aspect of it seems really fucking condescending. It reads as though these guys watched Roger Dodger, or read The Game, and are acting on some hackneyed understanding of What Women Want .

]]> By: anthony http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-754 anthony Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:52:17 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-754 All I read was "Tied up in trunk of car". All I read was “Tied up in trunk of car”.

]]> By: handwashcold http://notyourmothersplayground.com/2010/01/apple-c-apple-p/#comment-753 handwashcold Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:28:50 +0000 http://notyourmothersplayground.com/?p=798#comment-753 eeeewwwww. That made me feel dirty just reading it. You're not an asshole...but you certainly tagged him right: douchebag. I need to go take a shower now. eeeewwwww. That made me feel dirty just reading it.

You’re not an asshole…but you certainly tagged him right: douchebag.

I need to go take a shower now.

]]>